If you think I want David to make clear what is clear to me -- well, then, call it any of your favorite little names. Either he believes that he is a sinner [with current sin problems as opposed to temptation problems] or he doesn't. Since you are the one who challenged this (my assertion that David claims a sinlessness because of the HG's influence in his life) , since David's response is a confusing one (at best thought), I have asked the question below. Do I bait sameone to tell the truth? Come on, Judy -- get a grip. Of course I do. We are to be fishers of men and I am, the Chief Baiter.
Whew !!!!!
JD
In a message dated 1/18/2005 3:30:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, some people are able to separate themselves. From what I understand David to say he still gets around in a flesh body and he
has the same opportunity to sin every day as the rest of us both physically and emotionally. Are you baiting him? Is this some kind
of public humiliation?
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:24:51 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know why I have to choke this out of David, when his postings have been very clear on the subject to everyone except Judy.do you have sin in your life to any degree? Consider sins of omission (knowing to do right but not taking the time or energy to do it); event sins (such as murder, angry words, adultery ---- this is the "biblical sin" usually referenced in the Message); sins of the character (pride, selfishness, conceit, envy, laziness, anger, deceitfullness [different from a deceitful act], arrogance and the like). A simply one word answer will be sufficient at this stage.
Here is the question and we can start the discussion from this:
David Miller,.
Let's not speak of temptation, shall we. Temptation is not sin, as we all know. Such is a good topic for future discussion, but not now.
my answer is "yes." My answer for all on this forum is "yes." What about you, David? Yes nor no.
Jack D Smithson
The Webbmeister
