Sorry, Jeff, but I still do not see your definition of "sinless."
Maybe you or somebody else can show it to me. Sometimes I can be a little
slow catching on. Please be patient with me.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:32
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christian
Maturity
OK David Miller,
I am calling you a liar in regards to what you said
below, I highlighted it in RED. For the record,
under the subject line Traditional Christian Theology... I gave you an answer
that you refuse to accept resulting in the fallicy of your statement. It
was posted yesterday 1-18-2005 at 8:50 PM. You also say my comments are
"getting personal and impugning your integrity"? Show us your integrity by
admitting that you
A. Ignored my answer
B. Rejected my answer
or
C. feel that you are superior to everyone on this
list.
I have pasted My answer from 1-18-2005 at 8:50
PM below your post. David, I realize that you have the power to
kick me off of this list. But that would be the cowards way out. Go right
ahead, it will only prove me right!
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 14:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christian
Maturity
>
> I do not believe that I tap-danced
around anything. I answered his
> questions sincerely and to the
best of my ability. If I appeared to you to
> tap dance around
the question, it is probably because we have different
> definitions of
words. For example, perhaps you define sinless differently
> than
I do. That is why I asked you to define it, but you
never did.
>
> Your comments are getting personal and
impugning my integrity. Please stick
> with the subject at
hand.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
How about as Torah obedient as one can
possibly be in 5765. I know I sin and I admit it,
just like nearly everyone else
here.
Yet for most reading this thread, your answer (see
below) places you above everyone else. I am
sure I'm not the only one who reads your answer
to be that you claim to be sinless.
However, you tap-danced around John's direct question
in a manner that allows you to answer
with a non-answer.
Lance wrote:
> IFF David is 'one
of us' then, he consciously,
> actively, sins daily in thought, word
and deed.
Then I guess I am not one of you.
Peace be with
you.
David Miller.
Then you answer me with an attitude of superiority (I
may be wrong but thats how I
read your answer) as if everyone but you
"conciously, actively, sin..." Then ask me
to define sin?
Jeff
