Re: [TruthTalk] TruthTalk Moderation

[ttxpress]

ftr, i told Slade/TT (publically) my purpose is 'to back partic jt offa ppl like BillT'--and apparently that explanation carried some clout; also, *ed lvl* mattrs not in that (orig) cntxt--it iss not ok for rdrs to havta read incessant anti-intellectual drivl (uncntstd), couchd in some sorta mystical super-spiritual mythological mindset/s..it is not productv conversation among scholars, critics, or peasants..obviously it's benn v offensv to some v remarkable ppl, e.g., BillT   also, i usually let alot of postd 'myth' (IMO) go uncontstd for the sake of zeroing in on crucial issues;  classifyg cult 'theology' of late is one sorta side benefit of holdg jt's feet to the flame; evn in this cntxt ive lft untouchd that whch is respectably postd to any/all postrs, e.g., almost all of DaveHs and KDs discussions..KD, street prchr or not,  vs. DaveH, has made v remarkable progress in portrayg/givg readrs a chance to grapple with, a facet of cult cloakd in mystery..again, KDs efforts are v helpful mainly bec he's carrying his intellectual weight to the forum daily..intrestgly, it's presntd a collateral opp to parallel DaveHs cultic mystique with (e.g.) jts..let the rdrs beware is sum of moderation, i think (to keep briefly to the subj:)  regards, G     On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:37:37 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: || Those who beat up intellectually upon *others less educated* than them are in my opinion, intellectual bullies.