[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just plain silly. The effect of what I wrote earlier is this: we need each other or God would not have put us together. Why any would feel the need to correct this opinion is beyond me. Those who resist the fellowship (read: partnership and read it with emphasis) of the saints are those who run the risk of coming up with weirdness as a theological option. We need each other to stay on course, of course. That's all I am saying. If you disagree, I can say with great confidence, on this occasion, that you are wrong. I am right on this point and BOY DOES IT FEEL GOOOOOOOOOD TO BE RIGHT !!======================================================
JD
I do not see it as silly to point out flaws in your premise, John. No one is saying that we do not need each other. That point is valid. What I question is your assertion that one can have only a rudimetary grasp of spiritual things without the input of the group. The examples I gave you from both old and new testaments show that some of the "loners" were the greatest men of God that ever walked this earth. How then can you glory in being right when the Bible indicates that it is not always as you claim it must be?
Tell me how silly that is,
Terry
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
