RE: [TruthTalk] Concerning the Former TruthTalk Moderator

[ShieldsFamily]

I’d second that motion if you think you could enable the ModeratEEs to be able to understand what was written by the ModeratOR, G.  Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 9:11 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Concerning the Former TruthTalk Moderator   DavidM, et. al.: If you and our guests friends and posters on TT would either favor or tolerate it, and you'll use the post, referencd below, as your guideline/s with me, I'll volunteer to moderate TT effectively relative to it's original/ongoing purpose/s (inc your recent comments on 'purpose') and our current (existential:) conversational needs; also, if posters need the freedom/reciprocal power to moderate the moderator (lower case 'm'), I'm willing to advance, via TT, the concept of a dialogical democracy inc devotees of the Divine and his beloved Son who share His power sufferings and intellectual might in the Spirit of babes:)   (..perhaps, experimentally, you/we could try it (a month?), see what happens...I promise I'll let you know when I excommunicate myself:)   G     On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:18:34 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following has nothing to do with doctrine or theology, so if you > are not  interested, you can skip this post. ||