gentlemen, your perspectives,
represented below, are very clear--the opponent, perhaps
adversarial, relationship is evident..
let's try this so DavidM can rest
easier at least about our adulthoods (maturity? -- we'll
see:)..
(ftr, for now, my/his adulthood,
etc. is a different issue:)
..as i read you two, both
comments, below, pertain to LDS culture--*a positive (defense):
Blaine's
excerpt;
a negative (so
far non-ad hominem 'attack', which is fine): Kevin's
critique*
would you both, in separate
posts, in this same thread, for average reader consumption, also to
persuade average readers to adopt your perspective, please post your best
initial argument/s to justify your 'adversarial' thinking, as noted,
*above*?
(feel free to adjust
my *analysis* to suit your argumentative style/s or just take off from
there if you like)
in sum, this request is v
experimental, perhaps will enable many to enjoy your offensive and defensive
expertise, i.e., the best you have to say about your
perspectives, certainly avoiding a more potent 'moderatorial'
intervention--this is it for now:)
if you'll agree to try it, lets
see what happens (i'd say 'prayerfully', but that's what got this debate
heated up:)
regardless, best
regards:)
...btw, as a p.s., we
can entertain any counter proposals from you or anyone else on the list on
how to structure your 'debate'; other posters in other threads can feel free
to read/interact with your stuff and/or continue their own perhaps
less volatile 'debates'
G
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||The Violence against women in this MALE centered LDS culture is very troubling!
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:[LDS] are recruited by the FBI, the State Department and every police department in the country because they are trustworthy.
