To Gary (not George): If the word 'ridiculous' had had an exclamation point
follow it, would that have warranted a reprimand?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: February 05, 2005 10:56
Subject: [TruthTalk] Science and Faith


> *note subject change.
> Subject was "Two Questions" and now is "Science and Faith."
>
> John wrote:
> > Research science wholely depends on faith
> > to precede with its experimentations
>
> Ridiculous.  Science depends upon empirical observations to precede
> experiments, not faith.  God has nothing to do with science.  Science
> proceeds upon the assumption that knowledge cannot be obtained by faith,
but
> only through empirical observations that involve the physical senses.  If
> you cannot describe something mathematically, science does not consider it
> as a source of truth.  Science is inherently atheistic by definition.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to