OK Kevin. I am going to back off a bit. What you have written below has me a little worried. Lots of questions about you and what is going on inside. I will apologize for going oneup on you. You are better at it than I and I guess I didn't want to admit it. Hang in there with your ministry. There is something telling me to knock it off with you.
A brother no matter what,
John
In a message dated 2/5/2005 10:45:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you deal with facts?
"he who has eyes to see let him see"
Let us look with our own eyes at the Super Duper Quality of your Revered Greek PRE Texts
You ask where did the Book come from. Bible came from God thru Holy Men details in the Book
Not fat old men in academia
You make a distinction about PRE 300. What was it's pre 300 AD form?
You say some say it is Providential? Couldn't be if it came thru Acedemia
Have you told anyone how Hopelessly Marred your Greek Texts are?
And lest others think this is just some out of the way greek text
This is the "Oldest and Best" as the NAS puts it. Codex B Vaticanus
The 2 "oldest and Most reliable manuscripts" VATICANus and Sainaiticus of course.
If you would like to inspect them maybe you can get a pass from the pope for the vatican library.
Smithson had previously written:
Apparently you actually do not read.�� in an earlier post, I had assumed otherwise.�� I said " ....(in part) ....'� and Kevin thinks this means "can only work through."�� Where do you think your Bible came from, Kevin?�� K-Mart?�� Here is a news flash� --� it's present day form was the idea of the early church� (300-400 AD).� Some believe this process to be providential.� Your English translation came from the very men you criticize.� That the Spirit inspires our studied opinions is something that is beyond doubt except from the cultish right.� You needing help to understand scripture?�� That is not the problem as I see it.�� You actually need help remembering to take your medication�� (ADD is problem� ???).�
J
