These guys call everyone names constantly
This is how they deal with thoughts or issues, they even take potshots at those that are not online. Now if you agree with whatever they are not sure is the truth, whatever it may be, they will not take shots. If you do not agree then you obviously are a ____________
They are kings of Ad Hominem the tatic, not the TT rule which I have not seen applied even once to any of them. maybe I just missed it.
From the fruit of Lances & JD's lips I just consider them Lewd Fellows of the Baser Sort Acts 17:5
1 Peter 3;10 For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile
Romans 3 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness
James 1 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
James 3 And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell
And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.
I say this in Christian Charity.
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't have the problem with the facetious statement by Judy, but I felt that Lance's statement ("though your sister in Christ, bears little resemblance to you") was getting a little too personal. Spoken to Kevin, it might be ok if he doesn't mind, but said to some list members it could provoke a small cat fight. It really wasn't necessary to be insulting. He would do better to express the differences between Kevin and Sandra that he perceives more specifically and interestingly than the way he did.David.----- Original Message -----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:51 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Does it work?to help you understand the moderator's sense of intepretation, the line in green, below, is sarcasm--i smiled; the line in blue provokes (more)laughter..in general, the conversation seems v combative but friendly...no DMZ required (yet:)if anyone else wants to comment on it, feel free, partic if you see it differently; also, you can comment abt any issue of interpretation (of posts) privately, if you prefer, to [EMAIL PROTECTED]cordially,GOn Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:35:11 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Dear Sweet Lance, you are always so uplifting..--On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 06:14:57 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes [to Kevin]:I've spoken with, and have listened to, Sandra Tanner. Sandra, though your sister in Christ, bears little resemblance to you.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
