I haven't said anything about your character. I don't know where you are
getting this idea.
What I was saying is that your language reflects an intrusion from the
homosexual agenda and political correct advocates. You have argued with
Judy (as Bill has too) that one's viewpoint is not developed in a vacuum.
Now you seem to be offended if I point out just one of many influences upon
you and your philosophy concerning homosexuals.
Not true, my friend. You were talking about me when you wrote, "I still think HE is tainted by the homosexual agenda and their lies. Just the use of the word "gay" tells me that, and the use of the phrase 'gay types' tells even more."
I am not whinning about this -- just pointing it out. Your explanation does not line up with what you said, that's all. What we have here is a David Miller pretending that he has learned something about my compromised character ( he is tainted) and, the more I write (i.e. 'gay types') the more you pretend to know about me. Silly.
JD
David Miller wrote:
>> I� still think he has been tainted by the
>> homosexual agenda and their lies.
>> Just the use of the word "gay" tells me that,
>> and the use of the phrase "gay types" tells
>> even more.
