You do no different when claiming inspired status for the KJV.
I supply supporting documentation not just make claims thru rumor &inuendo
You have done no such thing. Scripture is inspired of God -- nothing about translations and there is book chapter and verse to defend that point of view. Yours is one of pure fantasy. You support your fantasy with a lot of internet rhetoric. You KJV was primary a revision of the Bishops' Bible. The scholars, the 54, used this bible and, a greek text put together by by Erasmus. There was a comparison of the Majority Text -- a forefather of the Received Text. These men of 1611 DID NOT just sit down and write down the English words. Rather, they studied (imagine that), compared translation AND greek text and then committed themselves to a revision of an existing work.
And you would deny this very process today .............. pretending that each, including the gay/bi-sexual king were all "evangelical Christians." You got me on that one, Deegan.. I actually laughted for about ten minutes. Truly laughable.
