On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:25:38 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fwiw, rabbis aren't 'unbelieving'..their 'beliefs' are potent as are (e.g.) John Lennon's
 
jt: Potently what? John Lennon was an antichrist figure who once stated that he was more popular than Jesus so whatever he would have to say would have nothing to do with the truth.
 
suppose 'let it be' and 'living in the moment' are intertwined in English in Eastern Std Time, Describe the temporal relationship
 
jt: I'm not too interested in the temporal G, since once we are "in Christ" we are living in the eternal; the temporal is passing away as we speak.
 
something less difficult? try categorizing it, e.g., describe EST succinctly in terms of the relationship betw 'be' and 'moment'
 
jt: Satanists use the _expression_ "so mote it be" does this sound kind of familiar?
 
then, once that's clearer to you, consider how their 'time frame' (as you'd describe it) relates to the Eternal (as distinguished from eternity and/or the idea of 'everlasting')
 
jt: Eternal, eternity and the everlasting life are exclusive and are only found in one Person.
 
then, try setting forth the implications of your comments for history--e.g., what happens to the 'past'--where doe sit fit(?); how can ppl be certain now abt what happened in the 'past'?
 
jt: The past is history and we have no control over the future so wisdom tells us to live in the present.
 
or, try asking "what does 'future' mean"--is it any clearer than (the?) 'past'?  if not, ask 'what remains to question?'
 
jt: Where I am at right now ie: "examine yourself to see if you are in the faith" ...
 
 
 
 
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:47:50 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jews may very well have a different set of reasons for living in the moment than you and I do
||
[jt:]
.. "beatle mania" and/or an unbelieving Jewish Rabbi.. "living in the moment?"
 

Reply via email to