Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

[Lance Muir]

TFTorrance, at the time of his last visit with KB, discussed the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This was but a month or so prior to his death. He affirmed the bodily resurrection of Christ.   There isn't much point in discussing the work of this man of God with those who neither know nor care to know him for who he was. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: February 28, 2005 03:21 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth resurrection event was of such a nature in covering it, that it would have been regarded in the same sense in which the man on the street   'the resurrection of Jesus had significance only for His disciples,' implying that it had no significance to the world.   Barth questions the historicity of the ressurection, This is not orthodox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin, Zero in on the error/s in this comment, please--readers may not perceive what is bothering you within it   g   On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:52:24 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "In a later letter to Gordon W. Clark, Carl F.H. Henry gave a pointed account of the occasion. When he, Henry, asked Barth whether the resurrection event was of such a nature in covering it, that it would have been regarded in the same sense in which the man on the street understands news, Barth became visibly angry and asked, sarcastically, 'Did you say Christianity Today or Christianity yesterday?' He then continued by saying that 'the resurrection of Jesus had significance only for His disciples,' implying that it had no significance to the world. The religious editor of United Press International, Louis Cassels, said upon leaving, 'We got Barth's answer; it was 'Nein' [the German word for 'no']' (Gordon H. Clark, Historiography--Secular and Religious, The Craig Press, 1972, reprinted in Christian News Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, p. 1480). Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.