In a message dated 3/3/2005 5:50:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

As Kevin has pointed out, the agreement between all the copies verifies the authenticity of the originals. This is only hard to understand if you are wishing to deny the authenticity of the Word.  Izzy

 




Absolutely correct except for one thing  -------   Kevin does not believe this and so he is stuck with the KJV. If he truly believe in the value of textual criticism,  he would not argue for the inspiration of the KJV and disregard all the others.    But my point remains.    Without the originals, conclusions written in stone concerning them are circular in nature and only acceptable to those who want to believe in their "inerrancy." 


JD

Reply via email to