Dave Hansen speaks of Protestantism's excessive (my word) view of hell and damnation. I'm with you on this, Dave. I'd NOT align myself with the views I've seen expressed, in this regard, by DM, Jt, Kevin and, Izzy. The word 'eager' may not be strong enough.
 
I was thinking of beliefs which 'control' our knowledge of almost anything. The changing of those beliefs carry with them such immense personal and social consequences that we often fear even to entertain the possibility that they are wrongly founded.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 14, 2005 01:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Jasc Paint Shop Photo Album 5 images]



Lance Muir wrote:
With a vengeance?
DAVEH:  Yes Lance, I meant that in the sense they will soon be flooding my inbox with more than I am capable of assimilating.  I did not intend to suggest their posts would be vengeful.
I think not. More likely praising God for the richness of the time they spent at a conference. I'll not steal any of their thunder.
 
Tell me, Dave, were it to be the case that you are, in reality, quite wrong as to your understanding of God and His Gospel, what do you believe the consequences would be? (eternally).
DAVEH:  If I am wrong in my beliefs, then would not my perception of my consequences also be in question?

    I think one of the biggest problems (if that is the proper word to use) I have with Protestantism is their view of hell and damnation.  I've said it before, but for some of you who are a bit new to TT, I'll give you a brief explanation.  It seems to me that Protestants are far too eager to toss those who don't agree with their perspective of religion on the ash heap of hell, so to speak.  Or rather, they seem to pleasure in the thought that God will forever punitively torture those who fail to walk that narrow path and enter the strait gate.  I just don't feel comfortable believing in a God who relishes torture, Lance.  I prefer to believe God is loving, merciful and would that all his creation benefit from their existence.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 13, 2005 11:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Jasc Paint Shop Photo Album 5 images]



Lance Muir wrote:
Is it not me. It is, in reality, Jonathan.
DAVEH:  Your son?
His son's name is Jacob. He was born Wednesday past. I did, however, appreciate the humour.
 
Did anyone, other than myself, take note that when the 'initiators' (John, Bill, Jonathan (currently off TT) are absent, that the 'traffic' lessens (as in 'nil').
DAVEH:   The silence has been deafening!   I've considered posting a few test messages just to see if INNGLORY was down, but I didn't want to be accused of over posting......    ;-)
I do not include DM as an initiator as he simply isn't one. Poor David, he was born with outdated thoughts in his head.(ala Anne Richards)
 
The 'thinkers' are on the way back from Mississippi. I'm confident that they will have much to say.
DAVEH:   ???  Does that mean John, Bill & Jonathan will be coming back with a vengeance?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to