|
JD, I just searched the archives for the
word “dishonest” in 2005. You definitely take the PRIZE in
accusing others of misrepresentations, false accusations, not being worthy of
trust, distrusting motives of others, etc.! (I don’t have time to
look up how many times you accused others of lying, deceit, falsehoods, etc.—you
can do that.) I definitely think “dishonest” is your favorite
nasty word. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 3/31/2005 11:58:02 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
False accusation JD. On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:10:57 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: JD: I will feel no need to continue a discussion with someone who refuses to
honestly discuss. Jd In a message dated 2/26/2005 5:18:39 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know you have said this, but it could not be further from the truth. If I
do not trust in some of your motive, should I cover it up,
pretend that it is not there? In a message dated 2/15/2005 11:41:44 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is no different than what DeHaan did
with his shady use of Greek words. It
is dishonest. On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 02:39:24 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: What you see as "twisting" is, in reality, an honest but perhaps failing
effort on my part to either express what I believe or to actually understand
what God intends to be saying to me now. As I see it, the question does not center itself
around "what is honest," but "what is
dishonest." It is dishonest to assume that one is right to
the exclusion of the possibility of being wrong. That is dishonest. It
is dishonest to deny the very heart of the gospel messsage --
that we all continue to possess sin and and that the blood continually flows in
dealing with this problem. That is heresy. It is blatantly dishonest to deny the Lord's concern for
unity.
But being nice and being honest is no longer an
option for me. (Freudian slip there, John?) |

