Gary wrote: > ftr, DavidMs word 'if', below*, means he realized > that jt intentionally misquoted John
Nonsense, Gary. You have agreed that if a person is comfortable with the idea of keeping their sin, then such a person is comfortable in sin. [I guess you are seeing the programmer side of me here (If... Then... statements are the kind of logic that I deal with everyday in software development).] What this means is that Judy's rewording of John (not quoting him at all!) was an accurate representation of what John's words communicated. The fact that her impeccable logic revealed the fallacy in John's initial statements seems to be of no consequence to you and John because you guys apparently reject reason and logic as valid tools for arriving at truth. Gary wrote: > it is implicitly impossible to be comfortable in > sin/s no matter how one says he feels or what > one says per se I think that was partly Judy's point. Thanks for reiterating it. Your statement here reveals the deception involved in John's initial statement that he is comfortable with the idea of a Christian keeping sin. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
