> From: "David Miller" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> *Note Subject Change
> > was "Eternal Judgment" and now is
"Legalism"
> >
> > John defined legalism as:
>
> > It is the imposition of their interpretations upon
others
> > > and the elevation of their understanding to the
status
> > > of Ex-Cathedra.
> >
> > This is
pretty much how I see you coming across all the time,
>
John.
> > However, the rest of what you described applies very
little to me,
> you, or
> > almost anybody else I
know. There have been a few over the years,
> but I
>
> don't tend to hang around people like that too long.
>
>
> > I use the term legalism in the way that the dictionary
defines it,
> which
> is
> > adherence to the letter
of law, or a literal interpretation and
> adherence
>
to
> > some law, rule, or religious code. You guys have a
certain
> theological
> > system passed on to you from
guys like Torrance and Wright, and
> you are
> very
>
> strict not to depart from it. It is actually your new found
> legalism that
> > makes it difficult interacting with
those who are legalistic in
> regards to
> > the standards
of Scripture. Like Bill said, however, most
> legalists
do
> not
> > realize that they are legalists. We are
creatures of habit and
> tradition,
> > and this is what
makes us all tend to be legalistic in some way.
> >
> >
I keep in mind that passage that says that the letter of the law
>
kills but
> > the spirit gives life. This tempers my
tendency to be legalistic.
> I
> think
> > the
absence of legalism would be sin, but I also think over
>
emphasizing
> the
> > letter can be a sin as well.
Remember that Jesus encouraged his
> disciples
> > to
listen and learn from the legalists of his day, but he warned
>
them of
> > their hypocrisy. He wanted us to do what the
legalists said to
> do, but
> not
> > to follow
their example of living.
> >
> > Too many times in this
culture we hear warnings against legalism.
> This is
>
> kind of like the hippy cry of the 1960's for freedom and liberty
> and free
> > love. Too often the battle cry
against legalism is a
> justification for
> >
anti-authoritarianism and anti-Biblical adherence. How about we
> talk
> about
> > this word legalism some more and
see if we can decide if it is
> really all
> > that bad
after all.
> >
> > As a starter for discussion, if
legalism were carte blanche evil,
> then
> > shouldn't we
just get rid of all laws? It seems to me that
> without
laws
> and
> > rules, then it would be very difficult for
anyone to be
> legalistic. What
> do
> > you
think?
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David
Miller.
> >
> >
> > ----------
> >
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
>
you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians
4:6)
>
http://www.InnGlory.org>
>
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send
an email
> to
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you will be unsubscribed. If you
> have a
> friend
who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> ----------
>
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians
4:6)
>
http://www.InnGlory.org>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you will be unsubscribed. If you
> have a friend who
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and he will be subscribed.
>
>
