*Note subject change
Subject was "Jesus as King" and now is "Paradigms concerning the law"

John wrote:
>> ... since we are not under law,  the qualifiying statements
>> found in I Tim 3 are suggestions  --  not legal requirements.

Izzy wrote:
> Why not just let God's "kingdom" rule, instead of JD's?
> This seems to be the crux of our disagreements-not just
> between us but between the liberals and the conservatives,
> so to speak.

I do think you are hitting on something here, Izzy.  The "Churches of 
Christ" movement are among the biggest proponents of this dispensational 
perspective that John has concerning us no longer being under law.  I think 
some of this still effects his mindset in our discussions here.

Have you noticed how they often interpret our theology as something that WE 
WANT?  They think we want few to be saved, or that we are eager for people 
to perish in hell fire and damnation.  They cannot read us without having 
this baggage cloud their view, no matter how many times we correct their 
misunderstanding.  Apparently there is a different working paradigm at play 
here, one in which some of us approach theology with the mindset of what God 
wants regardless of whether or not it would be bad news for us, but others 
approach theology with the idea of what they want to be the outcome.

Now add to this the idea that there is no more law, no more legal 
requirements, but only guidelines.  Once we accept that, then nobody is 
condemned if they only once get drunk, or only once fornicate, or only once 
commit adultery, or only once divorce, or only once covet, or only once 
steal, or only once lie, etc.  I have no problem with the concept of mercy 
and grace being extended to those who have fallen short in these areas, but 
to say that the commandments of Christ are only guidelines that do not need 
to be strictly followed means to me that grace and mercy is not really grace 
and mercy because there is no longer any law.  If there is no longer any 
law, then nobody is condemned by anything they do.  In such a world, 
everyone could live lawless lives and it does not really matter because 
nobody of guilty of anything no matter what they do.  No repentance 
necessary.  Sin does not really exist in any tangible form because there is 
no longer any law.  Isn't this the end of their conversation?

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to