'truthtalk' to
jt is philosophical, totally independent of serious theological
inquiry--e.g., goodness (as in the KJVs 'your goodliest men') is only a
(misunderstood) absolute exclusive category the opposite of which
is the category of evil
e.g., the
Bible's 'goodness', above, isn't dualistic; there, the 'goodness' pertaining to 'your goodliest
men' is a thoughtfully constructed human conclusion to a
comparison of relatively good men
You don't understand spiritual
reality G and I should know better than to even respond to this by now since
I'm sure that as in the past it will be an exercise in
futility.
What in the world is a "goodly" man? Sounds
like some Shakespearean concept - Jesus said there are none good
but God. He didn't allow ppl to call
Him good. So?
regardless, the
fundamentalist philosophical effect of
dualism upon 'truthtalk' is that one's theology, as
above, may be relatively good, however jt
(arbitrarily) believes that her philosophy is absolutely
good therefore not a smidgen evil like yours--in sum, in her mind,
even y/our relatively good 'theology' is
absolutely evil while never suspecting her philosophical
dualism, the darkness of the angel of
light, blinder than a bat 'in the caves of Shadowland', isn't
perfect
First of all my beliefs are not a
'philosophy' (not that this will make one bit of difference to you
G, your grey matter seems to be 'locked in' to certain philosophical
concepts). Secondly why would anyone in good conscience
follow what they believe to be
evil? Even my cat knows better than that. jt
evidence actually suggests that she has
neither..
||
' [..E.g., re: CW] add[ing] a
whole new book to the Word of God.'
Do you have humility in your
theology?
