Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Saved - Salvation

[Lance Muir]

JD is quite correct in saying TANCB! There are, IMO, 'corrupters' of that which the Bible means. That would include ALL participants on TT! MOST of that is quite unintentional. IMO, the central issue is that asked by Jesus in Matthew 16. IMO, every participant on TT answers that question with understanding, if not full participation, save the Mormons.  ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: April 20, 2005 07:17 Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Saved - Salvation JD says There are no corrupt Bibles   Paul says 2 Co 2:17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God UNLESS of course you read a Satanicly corrupted version: NKJV, NASV, NIV and RSV  PEDDLE the word of God Corrupt is to ADULTerate not quite the same as to peddle! The perverted translations do not even make sense, who went from town to town in the time of Paul, peddling? "Bibles Bibles I have got Bibles" rediculous! Satan has been at the ADULTerating God's word  business since the garden, and he has not stopped today. "YEA hath God said?" Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DAVEH:  Any comments about those who interpret them? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are no corrupt Bibles.   JD -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com