Another lie to cover the first one JD? Why not
just "give it up" because this is a gotcha!
What I said is that there are a lot of corrupt bibles
out there and I gave one as an example
which is hardly equating one with a lot. Do you
have a problem with dyslexia by any chance? jt
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
LIAR says You got me. Whoa -- how could I have been so inconsistent? No, actually, I meant what I said. Judy is the one who equated "one" with a "lot." This is what I mean -- you really don't read our posts. You just react.
Point is you changed your story. That is to be expected.When one lies it gets hard to keep the stories straight!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 4/20/2005 4:52:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SO, what you really meant to say was "there are few corrupt Bibles"
JD NOW says By the way -- "one" is not "a lot."
JD previously said "There are no corrupt Bibles"
You got me. Whoa -- how could I have been so inconsistent? No, actually, I meant what I said. Judy is the one who equated "one" with a "lot." This is what I mean -- you really don't read our posts. You just react.
JD
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
