RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1

[ShieldsFamily]

Caroline, None of what you stated are God’s criteria for deserving a place at Gods table.  There is plenty of room at the table, but only for those who have chosen to follow Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.  I can’t tell you if you qualify or not. You tell me.  Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline Wong Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:40 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1   We both are intellectually honest and sincere in our pursuit of the faith. We each go by the light of our understanding. We stand in the company of hundreds who believe and practice just as we do. There is room at the Lord's table for all of us, isn't there?   Love,   Caroline ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:15 AM Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1   I disagree rationally.  Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caroline Wong Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:34 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1   Indeed you would be if you disagreed rationally with what I wrote. If you disagreed emotionally, then it's another matter altogether.   Love,   Caroline  ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:46 PM Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1   Caroline, I can’t really agree with most of what you have said.  So maybe I’m just being intellectually honest with you? Izzy     I thought, surely Izzy jests! which is why I replied in kind. Watts is not saying the bible isn't true or looking for reasons to not take it literally. Believing the bible is literal is the simplest approach and Occam's razor favours the simplest approach. The only reason theologians abandon it is because they could not be intellectually honest and take it literally or pretend that things like language, culture, myth etc. does not matter.   That's why I say it was merely intelligence. We know Proverbs is a collection of wise sayings but not literal promises we get to hold God to. We know Psalms is Israel's songbook and it contains some pretty raw things said against their enemies and that we're not allowed to pray or think same way because of the new command Jesus gave us to love our enemies. Even the Chicago Statement of very conservative inerrancy acknowledge the presence of hyperbole in Jesus' statements and also that inerrancy does not apply to any translation.   Approaching the bible as truth in history, poetry, wisdom literature, biography and prophecy does not hurt a person's faith or relationship with God. It makes both stronger and richer. It is the product of our scientific age that we've understand truth only as scientific or mathematical and lost the beauty of truth in other forms.   Love,   Caroline