I was uncomfortable as you put it with you calling Perry a long list of names without dealing with the issues he posted. The smokescreen continues! What is the optical density of smoke?
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH: What I find interesting is that IF Kevin does not feel comfortable with being an anti-Mormon, then with what label would he be comfortable?....Certainly not pro-Mormon!
Hmmmmmmm........I suppose that is why Jesus was crucified. His detractors believed he was anti-Christian (so to speak), and hence won the battle in the short term. But there will be another judgment that will supersede the first one.
Lance Muir wrote:Dave:IFF 'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not. This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posed by Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but place you, and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would not consider your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in any way slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesus out of his Koranic understanding. It is IMO possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinely christian life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - those who win the war get to hold war crimes trials. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: May 08, 2005 11:12 Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] DispersionsDAVEH: I don't quite understand why you or Kevin would consider my questioning you about whether or not your attacking Mormonism would make you an anti-Mormon. Isn't that simply the definition of an anti-Mormon? And doesn't it accurately describe both you and Kevin? If that is true, then why would either of you consider itslanderous???Perhaps I should ask the TT moderator(s).....Have I hurt the reputation of either Kevin or Perry in anything I've posted to or about them? Charles Perry Locke wrote:From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kevin Deegan wrote:Do you agree with slandering someone?DAVEH: I wonder if Perry thinks I've been trying to slander him......Perry???I did not think of the term "slander" at the time. But come to think of it, using politically charged labels and questions and indefinites to hide labels is somewhat slanderous. But, I try to look beyond the words at the reason or meaning they were offered. And, knowing who is behind your belief explains it to me. There are reasons for your choosing those words in response to my attack against satan. Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Perry---- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
