DAVEH:  Is it better to realize something is missing, and search for it?  Or is it better to feel comfortable assuming nothing is missing, and then stubbornly deny the need for more knowledge of the gospel?

    The Lord's people of Bible times needed prophets.

    The Lord's people of Bible times needed revelation

    The Lord's people of Bible times needed further Scripture

    The Lord's people of Bible times needed the Priesthood

    The Lord's people of Bible times needed Temples

    Could it be a Pride in their own Righteousness that would cause some today to label LDS (Liars, Deceivers, SEDUCERS) and then suggest we do not need the things the Lord's people needed in Bible times???

Kevin Deegan wrote:
 
The WHOLE Mormon argument is you are missing something.
You need further revelation your Bible is incomplete, in error and lacking in the truth
You have the Bible BUT do you have the Book of Mormon? (Like the recent TV add)
You need Joe Smith
You need the priesthood
You need the Temple
etc.
So LDS beguile unstable souls with enticing words Col 2:4
HERE FOLLOWS THE ONLY SECTION WHICH MAY BY ANY STRETCH (or BEND) OF THE IMAGINATION BE CONSTRUED AS AN ASPERSION:
In actuallity it is LDS who are generally full of Pride in their own Righteousness
They have so much you don't have after all.

This is why some label LDS (Liars, Deceivers, SEDUCERS)

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


Reply via email to