I did not miss the main point CPL! Kevin was, in reality, doing the wrong
thing for the right reasons. Please think about what that means.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: May 11, 2005 13:59
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] baptism


> Lance, I was not comparing Kevin to Jesus. I was comparing the relative
> poularity of the two within their respective contexts. The main point,
which
> you may have missed, is that doing the right thing for the right reasons
is
> not always popular. I suspect that Jesus' approach was, in the eyes of the
> money lenders, as unpopular as Kevin's approach is with you. One big
> difference...Kevin's approach is not affecting your income!
>
> Perry
>
> >From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
> >Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:47:19 -0400
> >
> >I know Jesus. Kevin is no Jesus. Very bad illustration, Charles Perry
> >Locke.
> >(heretofor 'Chuckie' after the films)
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Sent: May 11, 2005 10:31
> >Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
> >
> >
> > > Lance, do you think Jesus was giving Christianity a "bad rap" when he
> > > overturned the moneylenders' tables in the temple? Instead, should he
> >have
> > > quoted some 2nd century BC greek philospopher on the existential
> >qualities
> > > of selling in the temple, then entered into meaningful dialog about
what
> >the
> > > philosopher really meant, whether or not it applies today, and then
> > > discussed how different interpretations of the scripture (OT) fit in
> >with
> > > the philosophy? Lets be Real Christians, okay?
> > >
> > > >From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > >To: <[email protected]>
> > > >Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
> > > >Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:39:55 -0400
> > > >
> > > >It amazes me that could could ask this of Dave, Perry! ,at least
> >without
> >a
> > > >'smiley'. Kevin is a jerk and, he comes accross as one (I probably do
> >as
> > > >well) on TT. I bet he does 'on the street' also. It is such that give
> > > >christianity a bad rep. He probably sees himself as 'suffering for
the
> > > >cause
> > > >of Christ' whereas it's just the 'jerk factor' in play.
> > > >
> > > >Kevin:Speaking JtoJ we ought to keep this in mind.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: <[email protected]>
> > > >Sent: May 11, 2005 09:29
> > > >Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dave,
> > > > >
> > > > >    I can't understand why you do not hang on every word Kevin
posts!
> >He
> > > > > backs up all of his biblical claims with scripture references, and
> >not
> > > >just
> > > > > one or two, with several to many. He backs up what he claims about
> >the
> > > > > Mormon church with statements from your own non-prophets and
> >leaders.
> >He
> > > >has
> > > > > a passion for the Lord, and quite evidently has been called to use
> >this
> > > > > passion, and his knowledge of the Word, to spread the gospel. I
> >would
> > > >expect
> > > > > him to act no differently on TT than he does on the street. Just
> >because
> > > >he
> > > > > does not fit your idea of what Truth Talk should be does not mean
> >that
> > > >his
> > > > > exchanges are not meaningful. In fact, in terms of proclaiming the
> > > >gospel
> > > >to
> > > > > the unsaved, Kevin is probably doing more on TT than any other
> >poster.
> > > >He
> > > > > steadfastly sticks to the message, not straying into the
> > > >pseudo-intellectual
> > > > > realms of so many posts. Those things are often titillating and
fun
> >to
> > > > > ponder, but when it comes down to it, either you believe or you
> >don't.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perry
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > > > >To: [email protected]
> > > > > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
> > > > > >Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:46:44 -0700
> > > > > >
> > > > > >DAVEH:  Nothing will make for easier discussions, IF one of the
> >parties
> > > > > >does not want to have a meaningful exchange, Kevin.  I view TT as
> >being
> > > >a
> > > > > >place where two or more people of contrasting opinions can
explore
> >why
> > > > > >other's believe differently.  I perceive that some TTers (such as
> > > >yourself)
> > > > > >are here not to have a meaningful discussion unless it results in
> >the
> > > >other
> > > > > >person adopting your beliefs.  Basically, you want to use TT as a
> >forum
> > > >to
> > > > > >convert people to Christianity as you  understand it...is that
> >correct?
> > > > > >Assuming so, you probably don't feel a need to find areas of
common
> > > >belief,
> > > > > >but rather cut right to the chase and try to overwhelm your
> >opponent
> > > >with
> > > > > >their error of thought/belief as you perceive it.  Have I
analyzed
> >it
> > > > > >correctly, Kevin?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    I harbor no illusions about changing your anti attitudes,
> >Kevin.
> > > >But
> > > >I
> > > > > >am curious as to why you are as you are (and why you believe as
you
> > > >do),
> > > >if
> > > > > >that makes any sense.  It's just one of my hang-ups I suppose.
> >So,
> > > >every
> > > > > >now and then you do reveal a bit about yourself, for which I am
> > > > > >appreciative.  But as I see it, you mostly put up a pretty thick
> >wall
> > > > > >hoping to wear your opponents down in their futile efforts to
> >overcome
> > > >that
> > > > > >wall.  Then you try to attack their perceived soft spot, hoping f
or
> >a
> > > >quick
> > > > > >victory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    That'll be $250 for your initial therapy session, please!
:-D
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Kevin Deegan wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>Why does it make discussions easier?????
> > > > > >>  Do you mean it will disarm those rascal Anti's?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>*/Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>     DAVEH:  I think it makes discussions much easier if common
> >points
> > > > > >>     are first found, Kevin.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>     Kevin Deegan wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>     What is this Mormon preoccupation with finding all the
> >things
> >we
> > > > > >>>     have in common?
> > > > > >>>     Why would one want to find; lets say, for example, all the
> > > >things
> > > > > >>>     they have in common with the devil?
> > > > > >>>          So what then; after we find what we have in common?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>     */Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>         Charles Perry Locke wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>>>         DAVEH:  Ohhhhhhhh....what an interesting response,
> >Perry!
> > > > > >>>>>    I must say that I do find it rather curious that you
would
> > > > > >>>>>         rather take a more vigorous new tack against my
> >beliefs
> > > > > >>>>>         rather than discuss issues of theology common to
both
> >of
> > > >us.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>           It is not what we have in common that is the
> >problem...it
> > > > > >>>>         is what we do NOT have in common.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>         DAVEH:  So you have no interest in discussing theology
> >in
> >an
> > > > > >>>         effort to see what we might believe in common?  Maybe
we
> > > >have
> > > > > >>>         two different perspectives about TT, Perry.  I view it
> >as
> >a
> > > > > >>>         place where people of divergent opinions can share
ideas
> >and
> > > > > >>>         quiz one another about their beliefs without feeling
> > > > > >>>         threatened or inviting a hard sell approach to change
> >other
> > > > > >>>         people.  I'm beginning to think you are here to do
> >battle,
> > > >so
> > > > > >>>         to speak.  To you, TT merely is a place to convert
> >people
> >to
> > > > > >>>         your way of thinking.  Am I reading you wrong on this?
> >If
> > > > > >>>         not, then for what reason did you come to TT, Perry?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >--
> > > > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > >Dave Hansen
> > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >http://www.langlitz.com
> > > > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > >If you wish to receive
> > > > > >things I find interesting,
> > > > > >I maintain six email lists...
> > > > > >JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
> > > > > >STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------
> > > > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
you
> >may
> > > >know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> > > >http://www.InnGlory.org
> > > > >
> > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
have
> >a
> > > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----------
> > > >"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
> > > >know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> > > >http://www.InnGlory.org
> > > >
> > > >If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
have
> >a
> > > >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
> >know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> >http://www.InnGlory.org
> > >
> > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
> >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
> >
> >----------
> >"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> >know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> >http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> >If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
> >friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to