DAVEH:  Kevin....did you inadvertently attribute the below posts to me (DH) instead of DavidM (DM)?

Kevin Deegan wrote:
DH This link does not give the full history and it has misled you. Tischendorf
first saw the whole text in the trash can ready to be burned on his first
trip. Read Tischendorf's account for yourself
 
Thanks for straightening that out.
 
DH Not all humans. I have never done that. Guys like Joseph Smith and Thomas
Jefferson did it because they believed that the Bible had been corrupted.
Not everyone who copied the Bible believed that it had been corrupted.
And this is exactly what happened to Aleph & B the two oldest & best manuscripts. 10 different handwritings, words erased, blotted out, words misssspeled, words squeezed in, scribes notes & scribblings, AND BLANK Columns No other manuscripts are as defaced as the two oldest and best manuscripts are. Why should they not go back in the TRASH where they came from?
"Marcion the heretic, (AD 140) is distinctly charged by Tertullian (AD 200), and by Jerome a century and a half later, with having abundantly mutilated the text of Scripture, and of S. Paul's Epistles in particular. Epiphanius compares the writing which Marcion tampered with to a moth-eaten coat. "Instead of a stylus," says Tertullian, "Marcion employed a knife. What wonder if he omits syllables, since often he omits whole pages?" S. Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, Tertullian even singles out by name, accusing Marcion of having furnished it with a new title." The Last Twelve Verses Of Mark, p 106

David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Caroline wrote:
> I wouldn't add words but some copyists did.

Those who add words either attempt to create their own version of the Bible,
or they do so for their own personal use, much like many might write in the
margins of their Bibles. Surely you recognize the difference between this
and copying the Bible for the purpose of making another copy and preserving
it. If nobody actually attempted to copy the Bible correctly, we would not
have any consistency at all to the Bibles that we now have.

Do you understand my point that in regards to the paradigm of copying the
Bible accurately, the more likely mistake would be to omit words rather than
add words?

Certainly it would seem to me that if we have 5,000 texts which are very
much alike, and two texts that are not alike, not even to each other, but
happen to be olde r, we should tend toward the belief that the 5,000 texts
are probably more accurate than the two older texts. Do you have a problem
with this kind of reasoning?

Caroline wrote:
> One of your president, Thomas Jefferson, separated out what
> he considered religious dogma and the supernatural from the
> ethical teachings of the bible to make his own bible.

Thomas Jefferson was a Deist. He did not believe in Jesus Christ as his
personal Savior. Jefferson did this for his own personal use. I don't
remember reading anywhere that he had ever tried to publish his Bible. Do
you know otherwise?

Caroline wrote:
> Other people added words and phrases to incorporate their
> dogma into the work. That's just how humans are.

Not all humans. I have never done that. Guys like Joseph Smith and Thomas
Jefferson did it because they believed that the Bible had been corrupted.
Not everyone who copied the Bible believe d that it had been corrupted.

Caroline wrote:
> By the way, it was not the Codex Sinaiticus that von
> Tischendorf found in the garbage can, not that it's all
> that important. For the full history of the Codex,
> check out this site:
> http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/C/Co/Codex_Sinaiticus.htm

This link does not give the full history and it has misled you. Tischendorf
first saw the whole text in the trash can ready to be burned on his first
trip. Read Tischendorf's account for yourself and you will find that this
is the case. The problem was that they would not give it to him because he
was all excited about it. Later (I think about 15 years later), he saw the
same manuscript again and this time was able to get it. Somebody had
apparently took it out of the trash can and kept it for all those years.
Tischendorf himself says that this was probably because Tischendorf had
gotten all excited abou t it on his first trip and the monks perceived that
it might be worth some money. Tischendorf had asked them to keep all such
manuscripts safe when he might return again for them at a later date.

Peace be with you.
David Miller.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


Reply via email to