RE: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom' response to 911??????

[ShieldsFamily]

Lance, there is definitely only one “accurate” understanding of scripture—and that is God’s intended meaning.  Granted, there are deeper levels of “accurate” understanding, but none of them invalidate the others.  Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:57 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom' response to 911??????   I'm just re-referencing the presence of diverse understandings of Scripture by genuine believers. You don't disagree with that do you, Judy? Is there, in all cases, ONE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING? I'd be interested in hearing back on this? I am prepared, unless anyone out there chooses to disagree, to say that 'it' isn't mine. Would any of you add your names to that list (thus demonstrating the accuracy of my 'formula' - please feel free to include your own, mor accurate formula)  ----- Original Message ----- From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: May 27, 2005 05:38 Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom' response to 911??????   What did Christine say below that exhibits such a failure to understand?  All three were cursed including the creation for their sakes...  So how does your "other" gospel say the scenario goes?  jt   On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:17:37 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christine:Did I 'miss' your response to the query concerning those who'know' Christ as a living presence in their lives but, fail to 'know' the meaning of Scripture in some or, many areas. (such as you just exhibited)? From: Christine Miller What about God's actions in Genesis when he punished Adam and Eve for partaking of the fruit? First he addressed Adam, who pointed to Eve, then he asked Eve, who pointed to the serpent. But God never asked the serpent for his explanation. He simply commensed with the cursing. I always found that fact interesting, and I think it applies here.   Blessings  Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David:I believe you slipped past the word 'not'. I do not believe this to be entirely nuts. I do not agree with your analogy either.This approach may well exemplify 'the gospel of the kingdom as preached by Jesus'. What was Jesus' response in the garden to Peter's action toward the soldier? From: David Miller Lance wrote: > Anyone other than myself think that this is > not entirely not nuts? Wait until I put my body > armour on before responding.   I agree with you, Lance.  Such an idea is nuts.  It assumes that those who attacked on 9/11 are not evil.  It is akin to God inviting Satan to dinner, asking him to explain why he has acted against him and his creation, and then attempting to negotiate a response with him that would avoid the judgment of the lake of fire.   Peace be with you. David Miller.