That is true -- hopefully you will come to see your complicity in the problem, as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:07:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments
John wrote: > I will refrain from that word in the future. It is not the word, per se. Calling people "pretender" or "hypocrite" is worse, in my opinion. The real problem is turning the subject to being about the person you are discussing an issue with rather than continuing the dialogue. Lance mentioned about the importance of framing questions rather than answers, and that was what I was doing when I asked you to define your terms. That is not what you were doing, at all. You were busy trying to convince who knows who
that I was functioning from a perspective of doubt and unbelief. If you hadn't misrepresented what
I wrote, you would have made some progress. But that is how you do business with me.
Instead, you accused me of trying to win an argument and make you look bad. How ridiculous. Yes it is. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
