Blaine, it seems that 99 44/100 % of the D&C was "revealed" to JS. Did he have a "general constituency" that voted on whether or not what he said was was revealed to him was truly revelation from god? How about his visions. Was there a vote on those, too? Do you think Isaiah or Daniel or Exekiel had people that voted on their prophecies to see if they were really from God?

Perry

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic ...
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:38:18 EDT



In a message dated 5/26/2005 2:27:22 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

What can you tell me of the 1978 (?) 'revelation' concerning the  increased
status of blacks in your church?




BLAINE:  The revelation to extend Priesthood to worthy Black males  appears
in the Doctrine and Covenants as Official Declaration --2. It was received as
a revelation by then President Spencer W. Kimball, and later  sustained
unanimously by the Quorum of the Twelve and eventually by all Church General Authorities. It was presented in General Conference by President Nathan Tanner on September 30, 1978. At the bottom of the revelation as it is written in the
D&C, it reads:

" Recognizing Spencer W. Kimball as the prophet,  Seer and Revelator, and
President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, it is proposed that we as a constituent assembly accept this revelation as the word and will of
the Lord.  All in favor please signify by raising  your right hand.  Any
opposed by the same sign.

The vote to sustain the foregoing motion was unanimous in the affirmative."

I repeat--NO revelation is accepted as official doctrine without this vote
by the general constituency of the Church. That has never happened with the Adam-God Theory/Doctrine, contrary to the efforts of many anti-Mormons to r ationalize it as a "doctrine of the Mormon Church." Noone believes it that I know of, and I doubt many ever did. If Brigham proposed it as a doctrine to the General Authorities of his time, apparently they did not accept it. One thing is for certain, it was never even proposed as an official doctrine to the
general membership for a sustaining vote.


----- Original Message -----


From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[email protected])
Sent: May 25, 2005 22:49
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:  [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
Socratic Method of T...



In a message dated 5/25/2005 6:03:14 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])   writes:

"The President of the Church is the only man on earth  authorized by God to
go beyond or add to the  scriptures" Teachings of the Living Prophets P18
published CJCLDS 1982




Blaine:  Even the President/prophet must have a sustaining  vote for new
doctrines he espouses to be accepted--As I said, the sustaining of the Adam-God
doctrine as official never  happened.  In several other cases, a sustaining
vote did happen, as for instance, the doctrine that little children who die before reaching the age of accountability inherit the Kingdom of God. This doctrine now appears in the D&C, for the simple reason it was voted upon and sustained. MANY so-called "doctrines of the LDS Church" do not have this status.
 Another  of these is the doctrine  that men may become Gods and populate
other worlds. Although it is widely believed, it is not in any standard work, nor has it been sustained as an official doctrine by the general membership. As I said, Kevin, Elvis died--trying to prove he is still alive is a lost cause, and only makes sense if you have some psycho/emotional investment in
believing he lives on.   :>)







----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to