Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] New Moderator for TruthTalk

Tue, 31 May 2005 20:32:58 -0700

ROFL  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!And you guys were so hard on the Canadian Bishop on this imagination thingy  !!!
 
JD 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] New Moderator for TruthTalk

What was your message to Deegan when he called me a liar?  Liar is ok  -- nuts is off limits?   
No message because I provided the proof of the lying along with the Name.

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do believe that should 'one' mistakenly take David or Judy seriously then, 'one's' stay would be foreshortened on TT. Just smile a virtual smile and, have some fun with 'em. The real difficulty is how seriously they take themselves.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: May 28, 2005 15:44
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] New Moderator for TruthTalk

It was not Slade who was rude and condescending.   Additionally, he got tired of some speaking as if they knew what they were talking about, when in fact, they did not.  I stay on TT because I like the abuse. 
 
JD 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:00:51 -0400
Subject: [TruthTalk] New Moderator for TruthTalk

For a mature believer "being ticked off" is no reason for lack of love and/or rudeness. It's possible Slade may
have misunderstood some things; I know he had no idea what I was talking about most of the time. The
answer to his predicament would have been to say goodbye and quietly retire into his studies and home life.
The way he acted did not exhibit one bit of grace.  jt
 
On Sat, 28 May 2005 12:54:41 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I do believe that Slade was more than a little ticked off with David and, understandably so IMO.

 
I don't think it funny Lance; I think it is extremely rude, to listmembers and most expecially to the listowner
with whom he had some kind of an agreement which was broken and nullified and that without notice.  If
nothing else he broke the Royal Law - Love which I am sure would have an equivalent in the Talmud.  jt
 
On Sat, 28 May 2005 12:43:25 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Was that an 'unintended funny'? 'broken one of the Talmudic laws'. Good one, Judith!
You can't know the heart Lance other than what proceeds from the mouth and by their own admission this is
how they (Slade and Kay) perceived the way God would have them walk even though it is far from NT Christianity. 
I believe they were both well meaning but to this day can not comprehend why Slade would take on moderation
of this list with so much on his plate ie work, study, 8 children at home and a part time working wife. I was not
surprised at his abrupt exit, only by the way they left with noone sure whether or not they were sad, glad, or
mad - All we were sure of was that they were gone... That had to have broken one or more of the Talmudic
Laws.   jt
 
On Sat, 28 May 2005 12:02:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've recently been in touch with Slade via Kay. You misspeak, methinks, Judith. You do so not vis a vis the Talmudic reference but as to his non legalistic heart. I watched him as a moderator.As to the Millers deux, I have naught against either.
 
From: Judy Taylor Not so.  Slade was more legalistic than David Miller by a long shot; anyone who tries to keep the 10 Commandments by observing the 613 man made laws of the Talmud IMO is excessively legalistic.  How is it your comprehension is so partial Lance?  Methinks you show a definite negative bias toward both DM and his sweet daughter Christine.  jt
 
On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:18:15 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David: Would you care to tell us, as list administrator, why you believe that the last two moderators, Gary and Slade, bit the dust? Both, by the by, were non-legalists were they not?
 
Ok, guys, this makes it clear that a new moderator is in order.  For some reason, Gary won't correspond with me, so I am taking action unilaterally for the sake of the list. 
 
Perry has agreed to take over as moderator again.  I appreciate the time Gary has put into the job.  The job is now Perry's.
 
The idea of a moderator is that he is the only person who will be speaking toward the person on the list.  He will try to help the rest of us stay on topic and stay away from personal attacks.  Let's please comply with his judgments.  Thanks.
 
David Miller
List Administrator
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation

Apparently.   
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Fri, 27 May 2005 22:18:56 EDT
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation

In a message dated 5/27/2005 7:55:41 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What was your message to Deegan when he called me a liar?  Liar is ok  -- nuts is off limits?   
 
Blaine:  I think Kevin has arrived at the "can-do-no-wrong" stage of membership in TT.  :>) 
 
 
 
 
 
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to