thank you.
 
Jd 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:40:26 -0700
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

Actually, Izzy, it was not that long ago that Dave and I were having just such a squabble. 
 
Perry 
 
>From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [email protected] 
>To: <[email protected]
>Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts 
>Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:30:56 -0500 

>JD why is it that you are the ONE individual who is in constant quibbles 
>about "I didn't say that," "Yes I did," "You said thus and such," "You are 
>lying about what I said," "Prove that I said that,", etc, etc, etc. Ever 
>notice that no one else has these squabbles except for you? Does this tell 
>you anything??? Izzy 

> __ ___ 

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:56 AM 
>To: [email protected] 
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts 


>Wrong again. The words, below, are your original post, Judy. The post 
>preeceding this one has me talking about something else and you dragging 
>Lance and Gary's names into the subject. I question you on this, >wondering 
>why you have included them in your response when I had not refereneced them 
>at all, and this "origianl post" is your defence of that strange occurance. 
>THIS IS THE ORIGINAL. Eventually, my response to your false accus ations 
>was to cite Lance's several posts proving that his concerns in script 
>included much much more than comments about the movies. 

>JD 

>-----Original Message----- 
>From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [email protected] 
>Cc: [email protected] 
>Sent: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 03:49:21 -0400 
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts 


>This is not the original - this is me explaining the original. You'll have 
>to do better than this... jt 

>On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:04:55 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> writes: 
>&n bsp;

>Here is your original post, Mrs Taylor. I am the one who spoke of rooting 
>and grounding -- not you. but you can read it for yourself. 
>Gary & Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of 
>the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. >I'd 
>be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) 
>that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an 
>expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up >with 
>his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about 
>giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt 

>And here is what you said you said: 
>Let me repeat; in my original post on this subject Mr. Smithson I said that 
>neither Lance nor Gary were 
>sufficiently rooted and grounded in God's Word to correctly di scern a 
>genuine spiritual gift in operation. 
>Look in the archives. This is what I said. jt 

>Not having a good week, are we? 
>JD 



>From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
><_javascript_:parent.ComposeTo('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');> 


>Let me repeat; in my original post on this subject Mr. Smithson I said that 
>neither Lance nor Gary were 
>sufficiently rooted and grounded in God's Word to correctly discern a 
>genuine spiritual gift in operation. 
>Look in the archives. This is what I said. jt 

>On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:34:04 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

> In your first post on this subject, you did not say that at all, Mrs. 
>Taylor. Not even close. 
>But your side does not care what it has written -- only what it says it >has 
>written. Let's move on. 
>Jd 


>That is your myth (read lie) JD because I never made a statement anything 
>like what you have written below. Did I say Gary O never reads the Bible? 
>What I said is that he is not sufficiently rooted and grounded in God's >Word 
>to discern what is and what is not a genuine spiritual gift in operation. 
>Actually I suspect he 
>would say they are all bogus because of the fact that he is Calvinistic at 
>heart. jt 

>On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:01:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

>myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God 

>JD 

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  
>Isaiah's point about false worship solidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting 
>in man'; in ch5, Isaiah condemns the arrogant attitude/s of God's people; 
>e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), a criticism of their economics 
>which reflects their real poverty (lording themselves over the 
>poor)..apparently such poverty results primarily from man-centeredness 
>witnessed in the philosophy partic of the/ir religious establishment (cp. 
>3:12, 14); also, 5:14 does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society 
>trapped in the throes of (its) spiritual suicide 

>On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>writes: 

>. read ..Isaiah 5:13,14 



> _____ 

>Discover Yahoo! 
>Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out! 
><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=32658/*http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html




 
---------- 
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org 
 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. 

Reply via email to