I already sent you the website in the humanist’s own definition.  Do you need it again?

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

 

Did you answer my question:  what is your definition of a humanist?   I don't think so.  Please avail yourself. 

 

JD 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:20:29 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

No, I believe I said you are a humanist.  So why aren't you? Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] N.E.T.

Get a grip JD check your facts - and cease from slander.  I have not called you anything of the kind

and I seriously doubt David has either since he is not into "name calling".  If you keep this up then

nothing you say will mean much.  jt

 

 

I think you are serious  --  THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONCERN, my dear  !!!   And I am serious. 

I am not a humanist  --  just a little loose talk in view of the fact that I have been called a humanist,

of late, by David and Judy  --  or at least my thinking has been given that label..  I am very much

NOT a humanist. 

 

Again, your concern is much appreciated and some surprising.   Guess I shouldn't have been surprised. 

 

Have a good day, today. 

 

JD 

 

Reply via email to