It was a part of their teachings back then that Temple marriages played a role in the new world you would receive
Still the teachings of the Church.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/15/2005 9:50:58 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Don't get me wrong -- Blaine was wrong IMO in the way this was handled. Should have been private.I could have handled this privately, and it may have been better to do so. However, I would probably not have learned who sent the "witness" letter if I had communicated with Perry privately--I did feel embarrassed that so many relatives/friends got that letter," which I felt involved them to an unnecessary degree in TT issues. I thought my own invitation was sufficient. The entire incident resulted in Raymond coming onto TT. I suppose that was a good thing, but since he did not last long, even that is questionable. I now see it as something that just got out of hand. But no tragic results, fortunately, so all is well, IMO.BlainerbWhen I was 16, I was almost converted to the Mormonism. My pastor found out about the meetings and asked if he could come to one of them. Yes was the answer. That was 44 years ago. It was a part of their teachings back then that Temple marriages played a role in the new world you would receive; the god of this earth was not the main god.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
