If dark skin becoming lighter Is a symbol of truth, then Micheal jackson may really be innocent!

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] NYTimes.com: Revisiting '64 Civil Rights Deaths, This Time in...
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:33:03 EDT


In a message dated 6/16/2005 12:03:09 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 believing Mormons literally developed horns when it got  dark.  :>)

Is that like Mormons believing that dark skinned persons became white  when
they got right?



Blaine:   The BoM does indicate some dark-skinned people became  lighter in
color as they became more in tune with the truth.  However,  it does not
mention how long this process took, and the suggestion is that inter-marriage with
the lighter-skinned Nephites may have had something to do  with it.  I am
pretty sure it was a natural phenomenon, although, who knows? That was then, this is now, as the saying goes. Who are we to question history? We were not
there, and so few details are given  (remember, the BoM is a condensed
version, an "abridgement" of much longer records), it is at best inconclusive!!! In fact, most of your criticisms should be labeled IMO!! ):> AND you OFTEN
reflect lack of faith in the power of God to perform miracles,  which is
exactly what JS said the Lord gave as his reason for telling him not to join any other churches. As the Lord said, "They teach for doctrine the commandments
of men, which have a  form of Godliness, but DENY THE POWER  THEREOF."


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to