DAVEH: LOL........I noted that you also forgot to include our
moderator on any of your lists, John. Was that also by divine
inspiration? :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny -- I was adding the phrase "Terry, Lance, Marlin,
Blaine, DAvid H and whoever are herein found to be reasonbly
guiltless" and before I could get the guiltless part typed in --
the computer sent the post ------------------- Divine implications
?????????????
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Knpraise
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:15:39 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Not exactly right. Here is a list of those contributing to the
blatant contentiousness found on this forum: Me, Deegan, Judy and Linda Shields.
Miller contributes in a negative way but his contribution is not as
much a contrast as in those who are mentioned above. Terry, Lance,
Marlin, Blaine, David H and whoever.
I represent (so to speak) the left and am the only one from that
side of the tracks willing to fight in the same frame as Dee,Ju and Lin. That has come to a
screeching (pardon the pun) halt. I can be critical without being
contentious. When I first came to this forum, I was just that. But
I allowed the situation to change me. And, in fact, that change
spilled over into my everyday
life. I have been the typical grumpy old man for several months up to
now.
Don't even bother retaliating with the usual "We shall see" and so on .... the only
ones who will fashion a retaliation
to this are D, J and L. Please do not bother.
The letter of I John is more about the need for brotherly love
than any other single issue.
The world objects to the contentiousness found in so many who
believe themselves to be right. My change
is not due to DaveH's comments
-- but they would have worked had they been stated earlier. A member
of this very list asked me a very simple question privately and that
was enough for me.
I am actually known for being a patient guy, always smiling,
seldom ruffled. No so the last very months.
Anyway -------------- the gang of four has been reduced by
one.
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:22:10
-0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
It has nothing to do with 'insecurity' DaveH; Kevin is being obedient to the Word of God to our
generation.
In Jude we are told to contend for the faith "once" delivered to
the saints. Note that it was not "half delivered"
with the other half coming later by way of JS. jt
DAVEH: Why do you feel so insecure
that you need to contend for your faith, Kevin?
Kevin Deegan wrote:
It is called earnestly "Contending for the faith ONCE
delivered to the saints" in the scriptures.
Of course you would like us to shut up that makes your job
of propagating error much easier!
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DAVEH:
I hope you two don't mind me interjecting a thought or two.....
When I came to TT, I had
expected it would be more of a round table
discussion type setting for those of many beliefs and religious
perspectives. However, I can now see why my illusions were incorrect.
Some of the participants view TT
as being a battlefield where the goal
is to vanquish Mormonism or any
other theological premises that contrast
those who feel uncomfortable with those they believe are under Satan's
influence. So Perry, I hope you understand why I don't have meaningful
discussions with you anymore. If you feel you are making headway
Perry, good for you. Just keep thinking that way. I find it somewhat
in teresting when some people arrogantly think they understa
nd something
and are so smug in their assumptions that they overlook simple truths.
I just don't believe such self deceptions are coming from the Spirit of
the Lord.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
>> From: "Lance Muir"
>
> As to 'being a supporter of Satan', Mr. Moderator, if being
> thick-headed in one's approach qualifies then, look in the mirror.
> IMO, you've made no headway
since my arrival on TT
>
> Well, just because these two mormons
do not appear to be responding
> does not mean my continually engaging them is not making headway.
When
> the cognitive dissonances they have to expend energy to deny reach
> critical mass, anything can happen!
>
> Also, there is more than one front on which this battle is being
> waged. One is exposi ng the truth to the mormons<
/SPAN> (although they are
> blinded by the deceit and cannot see it), and the other is the
> education of others on the forum who may not be as informed as you
> about mormonism and it's occultic origin and nature.
>
>> so, put a sock in it will ya?
>
>
> Now, I think we are getting down to the real basis of your
> complaint...your own boredom with my ranting about mormonism to the
> mormons. As long as I
continue to feel led to refute Satan in his
> mormon stronghold, I will
continue.
>
> Perry
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians
4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you will be unsubscribed. If
you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
|
