Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

[Kevin Deegan]

do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The Professor has nailed it!!  What I like about such comments is that I actually learn somethingfrom then commentary. 

 

Salute,   Mr G

 

JD 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:04:27 -0600
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah

ftr, jt's comment examplifies one of several conceited American traditions--Fundamentalist-dispensationalism; neither tradition, below, reads the text/s of Scripture for what is said, only for what it is 'supposed' to say, as below; which means there is a typical or consistent controlling idea behind  their common interpretation

 

the essence of jt's 'consistency'? it's philosophical: intentionally manage all real outcomes by categorizing behaviors as Good (acc to subjective criteria) or Evil (acc to subjective criteria) 

 

the Bible per se has nothing to do with this approach to reality, e.g., Jesus already rules--the miraculous healing or 'restoration' in Acts 3:7 proves it acc to Peter's ensuing sermon as he employs or 'interprets' that event as the basis for the eschatological 'restoration of all things'

 

 

 

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:14:26 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I understand Acts 3:21 to be referring to the Kingdom of God in it's fullness, that is, when King Jesus rules and

reigns from the New Jerusalem with a sceptre of iron.  jt

 

||

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com