-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:40:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Sonship
John wrote: > I do not assume my own conclusion regarding > the eternal Sonship of the Christ. John wrote: > I had NO OPINION when I entered my > study on this subject. John wrote: > IF Christ is the Eternal Son, he was such > before the virgin birth. A perfect example of a tautology. Where do we go from here?
You tie three statements together, pretend that I ordered these thoughts and then,
restate your insult. IT ALWAYS COMES DOWN TO this between you and me .. without
exception. There is not one thing that is presumptive in the three unrelated
(contextually) comments.....especially the last comment. John wrote: > An eternal Son only CONTINUES to be a son. Bill Taylor seems to see something more than this. Did you read about how he thinks the phrase, "this day I have begotten you" applies to the ressurection? I do not read Bill as saying that before the resurrection, Christ was something
other than the Son.
David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
