So what, you say? Because I think it is misleading to tell only half the story. Mat 12:31a makes a wide sweeping statement that is conditioned by 12:31b. Without 12:31b, 12:31a is untrue. They go together. Together they form a truth that cannot be formulated by either part alone.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator commant **
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:06:57 -0600

yep, but so what? the former condition is radically true or the latter
condition means nothing

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:06:54 -0700 "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> "... but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven
> unto  men. " - JC, the rest of Matt 12:31.
||


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to