Did I miss something, here??? What test?? It is up to the moderator. Whether we think grown men and women should be "moderated" or not, there is the principle of authority and God's support of same. If Rome was to receive "honor," certainly our moderator should receive no less. To refuse his admonition is to put one's self square into the camp of the rebellious. Is there a biblical alternative to this understanding???
JD
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:57:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator commant **
Kevin wrote: > I meant the foolishness of the AD Hom rule since > there is no human way to frame it by use of an > objective test. Even if this were true, it would not disqualify the idea of having an ad hominem rule. Subjective tests are just fine. We attempt to frame the rule objectively in the following way: write on the subject being discussed and do not attack the other poster's character. We enforce the rule in a subjective way: The moderator determines when someone is crossing the line and causing the discussion to detour because of personal attacks. What is foolish about this? Peace be with you. David Miller ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
