". . . In other words, there is a spiritual truth
and understanding that is understandable in the heart, but not
with language."
Very interesting, David. I agree with you and call
this understanding "theological instinct," a tacit knowing in a spiritual
context. I would like to bring this back up for discussion sometime as
well.
Bill
PS I am very "rushed" at present, with other
responsibilities to meet. Perhaps in a week or two I will be able to devote
more time to our worthy discussions on TT. Blessings all.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] It fell to me to defend David Miller
>
>
> > Lance wrote:
> > > One who has been reading you, David,
> > > believes you to be 'Oneness' in your understanding
> > > of the Godhead! IFF this were so then, you would've
> > > gone further than being a non-trinitarian. You would
> > > be anti-trinitarian.
> > >
> > > Will you kindly tell us if that person is correct?
> >
> > That person is incorrect. I consider myself a Trinitarian.
> >
> > Having said that, let me also say that people who agree with the Trinity
> do
> > not always see it the same way. In fact, many people hold to the idea of
> > the Trinity as being a mystery that cannot be understood. I would
> disagree
> > with this perspective. I believe that the Godhead can be understood, but
> it
> > cannot be articulated well with words. In other words, there is a
> spiritual
> > truth and understanding that is understandable in the heart, but not with
> > language. I believe that modern day Oneness doctrine (sabellianism) helps
> > bring balance to our understanding of the Godhead, and even Arianism at
> some
> > times can tend to bring balance, but that is difficult for me to say
> because
> > I am a Trinitarian who leans very heavily toward sabellianism (if you
> > understand my drift here).
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] It fell to me to defend David Miller
>
>
> > Lance wrote:
> > > One who has been reading you, David,
> > > believes you to be 'Oneness' in your understanding
> > > of the Godhead! IFF this were so then, you would've
> > > gone further than being a non-trinitarian. You would
> > > be anti-trinitarian.
> > >
> > > Will you kindly tell us if that person is correct?
> >
> > That person is incorrect. I consider myself a Trinitarian.
> >
> > Having said that, let me also say that people who agree with the Trinity
> do
> > not always see it the same way. In fact, many people hold to the idea of
> > the Trinity as being a mystery that cannot be understood. I would
> disagree
> > with this perspective. I believe that the Godhead can be understood, but
> it
> > cannot be articulated well with words. In other words, there is a
> spiritual
> > truth and understanding that is understandable in the heart, but not with
> > language. I believe that modern day Oneness doctrine (sabellianism) helps
> > bring balance to our understanding of the Godhead, and even Arianism at
> some
> > times can tend to bring balance, but that is difficult for me to say
> because
> > I am a Trinitarian who leans very heavily toward sabellianism (if you
> > understand my drift here).
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
> >
> >
>
