[TruthTalk] David Miller acknowledges a lack of Scriptural iunderstanding- - at last

[Lance Muir]

Not one 'pretends to understand the intended meaning of these passages as well as Jesus does', even with the Holy Spirit.   I do believe that this is the acknowledgement that David sought from me just yesterday.   Question to David as I anticipate a 'warning' to be issued:Should you exclude yourself from this statement YOU made then, kindly offer an explanation for its non-application to yourself.   Question to the co-moderators: Argumentum ad Hominem is one of the fallacies in the study of logic. Perhaps it has no place on TT. Why not, for Judy's sake if for no other, switch to the Scriptures as a guideline for conduct on TT? Surely we esteem the 'truth of Scripture' over the 'truth of logic'? If we're gonna criticize the employment of theology as a legitimate discipline we must conclude, logically of course, that this atheistically rooted discipline must not serve to govern us.   I have every confidence that David & Perry will take this matter under advisement as I perceive the 'L-word' to be far more reprehensible than the 'D-word'.