Do you have less than previously? iz

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PUBLIC APOLOGY TO BILL TAYLOR

 

Contrition? Nay!

 

Why? Time.

 

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: July 15, 2005 13:10

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] PUBLIC APOLOGY TO BILL TAYLOR

 

WHAT!!! No Lance to pick on anymore? (a la Richard Nixon)  Why the sudden departure after all the abuse you’ve already taken? Surely this is not an act of contrition? Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PUBLIC APOLOGY TO BILL TAYLOR

 

I'm giving a 'heads up' to all and sundry (redundant?) that I shall be with you but one more week. Please avail yourselves of 'vilification opportunities' between now and then. (stage direction:A cheer could be heard throughout the land over the impending departure)

----- Original Message -----

Sent: July 15, 2005 12:23

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] PUBLIC APOLOGY TO BILL TAYLOR

 

It’s Bill, not you Lance, who has turned it in the current direction where “stuff” is happening.  (And not DM, and not Terry).   We reserve vilification of you, Lance, for other more appropriate occasions.  Surely you will avail us of several this very day. J  You can’t throw yourself on the sword on this one.  iz

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] PUBLIC APOLOGY TO BILL TAYLOR

 

He told me that upon using his name in my little analogy that 'stuff' would happen. Oh said I, surely you're being paranoid! Well, as it turns out, surely not.

 

Once David has given Bill a somewhat more comprehensive response than 'yes!' I shall implore all others to leave off addressing this issue vis a vis my friend, Bill.

 

Feel free to level both barrels at me as someone actually deserving of such villification.

 

Many thanks,

 

Lance

Reply via email to