Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'

[Lance Muir]

Where on earth did THAT idea come from? Lower your intake of sasperella (it was OK for Hoppy but not for you, apparently) The Bible is just fine, Terry. It is one or both of the contributors who is not 'fine' in their understanding of the Bible's teaching. This in spite of the fact that they both have access to the Spirit's leading on the matter at hand. ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry Clifton To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: July 22, 2005 13:49 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter' Lance Muir wrote: At last we've been presented with the opportunity to demonstrate this 'He will lead you into all truth' thingy is misunderstood by those who have most often cited it (Judy, David).   Both are faithful servants of the Lord, both have 'studied to show themselves approved', both are 'berean' in their approach....HOWEVER ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO WEASEL OUT IN THE END SANS A SATISFACTORY CONCLUSION! One is more committed to belief than reality.   ============================================================= Or, you could conclude that the Spirit is not yet finished leading.  That way, you would not be claiming that the Bible is in error. Terry