On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:15:09 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's not necessary--JCs theological views are remarkably clear enough; otherwise, or lacking certain clarity as you appear to allege, the NT has had no meaningful purposeYou're lost from the start GO because He had no "theological views" per se. His Words are Spirit and they are Life; anyone looking for philosophy or theology is barking up the wrong tree.also, your views are clear enough, too--the issue is the divergence/s you choose to maintain from the NT as it is--the comment below is illustrativeMy views apparently are not clear to you or to JD since both of you consistently misquote them.ISTM that whenever you would like to elevate the conversation toward discovery of the NTs message/s, it will be apparent--you'll us ask an intelligent questionWhy look for living water in broken cisterns when I can go to the fountain Himself.On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:30:17 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:..wait till Jesus returns to see what he was talking about then....||
