-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:00:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Creation & Evolution
JD wrote: > JT asked what constituted "intelligent discussion." > It is that discussion that seeks to not only impart > knowledge but is willing to receive knowledge > from others, as well. I hope you intend to lead us by example in this area. JD wrote: > Judgmentalism is not a part of the discussion Any discussion that does not include judgment would be a poor discussion, just plain boring too. We must make judgments and then put forth the proper reasoning to support those judgments. What do you mean by "Judgmentalism"? Do you really mean prejudice?
No, I mean judgmentalism, not judgment or prejudice. In the context of my remark, I think
"judgmentalism" has an obvious meaning. JD wrote: > Intelligent discussion is impossible when one is convinced > that the counsel of others is not needed in the pursuit of > "truth." If this were true, then Jesus Christ would not have been capable of intelligent discussion! What other human's counsel was he convinced that he needed?
What Christ, the Creator of truth, does to arrive at truth is not the issue here. Take Christ
out of your argument and make your point. The simple fact that we need teachers and evangelists
proves my point. As is the case in many of the posts on TT, true discussion is absent, replacedwith nothing more than passionate monologue. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
