Lance wrote: > I've known dozens who've read and, apprehended it. > I've known of a couple, David among them, who didn't.
I don't think there was anything there difficult to apprehend. It was pretty much the a,b,c's of the work of Christ. Lance wrote: > I do believe he's in some kind of theological > 'bondage'. No, I am not kidding. How so? Is it that you have trouble articulating your perceptions? I have given you more than ample time to converse with me about TFT and the Mediation of Christ. Little has come forth. Lance wrote: > Yes, Iz and Judy, I do know how presumptuous > this sounds. IMO, it is the apprehension of the > double move of God in Christ, undercutting David's > 'works righteousness' framework, emphasizing the > ALL OF CHRIST that eludes him. I see nothing in TFT that undercuts anything that I believe. I think TFT just doesn't carry it out far enough in this small little book. He is rather wordy to say some rather basic, straightforward things. Very good things he says, but nothing that undercuts any of my theology. In fact, I would say that all his "Mediation of Christ" is foundational for any of my theology. What in particular do you think undercuts my theology? Why do you think I am in some kind of theological bondage? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
