|
I think we could start by being graceful, showing grace rather than
sarcasm, being more concerned about loving our neighbor or our enemy
than we are about pointing out errors in what they believe. I am not
suggesting that you adopt their position or that you compromise what
you believe. I am saying that if you cannot agree, consider that they
are being sincere even if they are in error, and with that in mind,
very politely ask questions that will help them understand better as
well as help you understand them better. Try to remember that your
opinion and three dollars will get you a whopper at Burger King. Do
not over estimate the value of your contribution to the conversation.
You do not have to jump on every word someone else speaks, and when you
do, it simply creates a situation where everyone digs in their heels
and butts heads and everyone ends up defending their position instead
of trying to understand what the other guy is trying to say. Jesus,
Peter and Paul spoke a great deal about loving others. They said very
little about winning a debate. For what it's worth. Terry ============================================================ Judy Taylor wrote:
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - Noone knows least of all... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - Noone knows least o... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - Noone knows lea... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - Noone knows... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - Noone k... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion - No... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confusion ... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confus... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confus... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confus... knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Musical Confus... Kevin Deegan

