Who, on TT, has demonstrated  an ongoing understanding of your meaning, Judy?
 
Sent: October 10, 2005 05:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted

Wrong Lance; JD has no frame of reference for what I write and you don't either... which fact is quite evident
by your response and his.
 
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:55:40 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Unless you 'believe' something other than that which you've been writing for a great while on TT Judy, The Bishop of
California knows quite well your 'stated' beliefs.
Judy does not believe anything of the sort - JD has not so far learned to identify the accuser and whatsmore JD has no idea what I believe.  jt
 
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:37:55 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think I'll let Judy speak for herself.  iz


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Judy believes exactly those things.  
 
JD
 
 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, get real JD.  No one has denied that.  We are just not Antinomians. And you said yourself that you believe in obeying Jesus. So what?s the big squabble? iz
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
so, you, too, reject the notion that Jesus was God on Earth and that He is our accomplishment (solo complii) , The Father looking to His vicarious sacrifice and life for our justification ???   Is that the case?  JD 


From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy, how does it feel to be called a heretic by someone who is outraged and indignant if he is accused of being one? It just depends upon which side of the bread your butter is on, I guess. J  iz
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
You are such a heretic,  Judy.  
 
 

Reply via email to