On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:15:43 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Would you put G on the 'not' list? Having done so, what IYO, underlies this?
 
The incomprehensible nature of his writings along with his obvious adoration of Bob Dylan whose words he elevates much more
than those of the Living God.
 
Conversely, do YOU understand/apprehend what they (those who do not understand/apprehend you) mean when they write on TT?
 
I understand scripture in it's setting but when they quote using a doctrinal twist, many times I recognize it but
probably do not apprehend their larger picture.
 
At the heart of the matter, do you see this as (1) lack of clarity in communication (2) unbeliever's inability to apprehend believers (3) disagreeableness (4) lacking spiritual discernment or....INSERT YOUR LIST HERE
 
At the heart of it I see the problem being a combination of tradition/orthodoxy along with doctrines of men that make the Word of God
of no effect in the lives of ppl.
 
Some do have the same understanding as me about much of God's Revelation through scripture
but these do not include you, JD, or Billt
 
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:12:19 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Who, on TT, has demonstrated  an ongoing understanding of your meaning, Judy?
 
 
Wrong Lance; JD has no frame of reference for what I write and you don't either... which fact is quite evident
by your response and his.
 
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:55:40 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Unless you 'believe' something other than that which you've been writing for a great while on TT Judy, The Bishop of
California knows quite well your 'stated' beliefs.
Judy does not believe anything of the sort - JD has not so far learned to identify the accuser and whatsmore JD has no idea what I believe.  jt
 
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:37:55 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think I'll let Judy speak for herself.  iz


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Judy believes exactly those things.  
 
JD
 
 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, get real JD.  No one has denied that.  We are just not Antinomians. And you said yourself that you believe in obeying Jesus. So what?s the big squabble? iz
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
so, you, too, reject the notion that Jesus was God on Earth and that He is our accomplishment (solo complii) , The Father looking to His vicarious sacrifice and life for our justification ???   Is that the case?  JD 


From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy, how does it feel to be called a heretic by someone who is outraged and indignant if he is accused of being one? It just depends upon which side of the bread your butter is on, I guess. J  iz
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
You are such a heretic,  Judy.  
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to